Increasingly ISVs and technology companies are confronted with capacity bottlenecks, and lack of technology talent with the requisite exposure in their native environments. As a result, they are unable to handle a multitude of challenges such as migration to a SaaS mode, up gradation of their technology stack, enhancement of product functionality and customization requests.
At the same time, ISVs are reluctant to resort to traditional IT outsourcing, as they are primarily worried about of lack of dedicated resources from the service providers, and also unsure about the efficacy of offshoring and distributed development in a product development environment. In this blog, we will share with you some of the relative advantages of dedicated teams as opposed to conventional IT outsourcing for ISVs service model:
| Traditional Outsourcing Model | Dedicated Team Model | |
| Time-To-Market | Uncertain, dictated by the nature of engagement with the service provider | Guaranteed reduced time-to-market, as the customer is in complete control of the team, work flow and deliverables |
| Innovation & Capability | Low level of task based reactive output with little incentive for innovation | High performance, proactive teams capable of significant value addition in sync with the customers native team |
| Business Value | Low, very basic staff augmentation mode | High, direct contribution in delivering measurable business value to customer |
| Risk Mitigation | Difficult to anticipate and manage risks due to lack of visibility into service providers processes, team management, and resource movements | Easy, due to complete managerial control over people and processes and negligible risk of attrition and resource movement due to locked-in resources |
| Ownership/Span of control | Owned by service provider, low level of integration with customer’s team | Owned and managed by customer, complete integration with customer’s team |
| Engagement | Basic, and hands off | Mature, and collaborative |
| Success factors | Vendor selection, service provider’s maturity and retention of same team across delivery cycles | Team selection, product development know-how, and dedicated high performance teams |
| Contract Management | Significant attention to detail required in contract planning covering all aspects of the engagement, and adequate foresight needed to provide for contingencies | Simple, and easy to interpret contract based on “people+cost of shared services” model |
| Scope & Flexibility | Rigid, need clearly defined scope and deliverables from the customer | Flexible, driven by customer’s requirement and adaptable to changing business dynamics. Inbuilt agility, decide as-late-as possible and start as soon-as-possible |
| Team composition and quality | Dictated by the service provider | Controlled by the customer right from the recruitment process including roles and composition |
As a founder, CEO, or CTO of an ISV, take advantage of dedicated team model in a distributed development model, gain additional development capacity, execute your product roadmap, and realize your business goals.
